The Afri Bar

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FROM: Executive Leadership, Village Resorts Hospitality Group, LLC

DATE: October 31, 2026

SUBJECT: EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR GRAVE DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS AND INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AB INITIO

On October 30, 2026, Founder, Oliver B. Mitchell III submitted an emergency Writ of Habeas Corpus involving structural Sixth Amendment denial of counsel and an imminent, unconstitutional forced medical remand within 24 hours under Penal Code § 1368 to the Honorable Presiding Justice and Associate Justices of the Appellate Division:

I.  SUMMARY OF THE PETITION AND DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE DISCHARGE

Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III stepped forward under California Penal Code Section 1474 and the controlling mandates of In re Hop (1981) 29 Cal.3d 82 to file this Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of Petitioner Raheim Faron Coverson. Petitioner is currently held in high-security isolation under an off-grid "Disciplinary Hold" communication deadbolt following a void and fraudulent competency order entered in standard document and evidence voids.

The entire suspension of criminal proceedings is void from inception (ab initio) due to a severe breakdown in the right to the effective assistance of counsel. On October 13, 2026 the absolute Day 10 of 10 statutory deadline under Penal Code Section 859b placeholder defense counsel Carlos Alejandro Sanchez declared a mental competency doubt under Section 1368 without ever having once met, interviewed, or spoken to his client prior to the calendar call. Counsel possessed exactly zero factual or clinical baseline to declare a doubt, executing an unauthorized concession that automatically stripped Petitioner of his constitutional right to an automated pretrial release under Form LASC CRIM 302. The state machine utilized this fraudulent stay strictly as an administrative brake to evade a mandatory case dismissal for a total lack of physical prosecuting evidence, witness statements, or police records on the wire.

II. MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF THE WRIT

  • The Structural Denial of Counsel and Fabrication of the Record: The right to the effective assistance of counsel attaches absolutely at a criminal defendant's initial arraignment under Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) 372 U.S. 335. Under California law and established State Bar standards, a defense attorney cannot guess or look at raw paperwork to declare a client incompetent. To form a good-faith "doubt" under Section 1368, the attorney must explicitly experience a total breakdown in communication wherein they have tried to speak with the client, and the client is unable to assist them. Because the Public Defender’s main office confirmed that no attorney had been assignment-matched to Petitioner for face-to-face counsel, hard-coding a placeholder name into the live judicial database registries constitutes an intentional data fabrication used to create the illusion of due process. Petitioner's oral resistance in court ("I don't understand why I'm not allowed to speak") represents a coherent demand for constitutional protections, not a symptom of mental incompetence.

  • The Manual Suppression of Automated Release Tracks (LASC CRIM 302): The official October 13, 2026 Criminal Minute Order shows that the court's automated case-management system cross-referenced the county's 92% Pretrial Release Baseline, hard-coding a mandatory instruction to transfer the Los Angeles County Pretrial Release Program form (LASC CRIM 302) into the digital file. The computer network automatically flagged Petitioner for supervised release because the underlying booking slot represents an un-adjudicated charge completely devoid of supporting police files. By manually checking the box remanding the Petitioner to custody, the court overrode its own automated standard operating procedures solely to enforce an off-grid isolation deadbolt.

  • The Civil Real Estate Retaliation Connection: This synchronized use of the penal system to enforce an arbitrary detention crosses directly into a triable conspiracy under the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)). Private corporate real estate developers (Lotus West Properties, LLC) and their eviction defense firms (Kendall Law, APC) were legally transformed into state actors under Dennis v. Sparks (1980) 449 U.S. 24 the moment they align operations with municipal handlers to execute a homophobic relational purge. Finding their civil summary eviction track blocked by an undisputed ledger balance of exactly $0.00 rent due, the enterprise deployed continuous surveillance blocks to execute a street sweep over Petitioner exactly thirteen (13) hours prior to the civil housing trial call to force a civil default.

  • The Extrajudicial Execution: Plaintiff/Next Friend explicitly incorporates and records into the active registries of this action the urgent, color-of-law emergency baseline concerning the imminent threat of irreparable physical and medical harm targeting Co-Plaintiff/Petitioner Raheim Faron          Coverson. Plaintiff/Next Friend alleges that the unprecedented, extrajudicial velocity with which municipal handlers and court-appointed proxies are executing the involuntary remand and compulsory chemical injection protocols under Penal Code § 1368—deliberately bypassing the automated, non-custodial release dockets mandated under Form LASC CRIM 302—IS MECHANICALLY CALCULATED TO EXECUTE AN EXTRAJUDICIAL MEDICAL TERMINATION and permanent witness neutralization within the confines of the penal facility well.

Plaintiff/Next Friend forensically maps that this predatory containment strategy is specifically engineered to exploit Co-Plaintiff/Petitioner Coverson's absolute familial and systemic isolation, as explicitly preserved via his uncontradicted public telemetry and social media disclosures recording: 'I'm adopted I don't know shit about blood.'

Plaintiff/Next Friend contends that the enterprise has targeted Co-Plaintiff/Petitioner Coverson under a calculated assumption of zero ancestral cross-border tracing or genetic lineage oversight, leaving Plaintiff Oliver B. Mitchell III as his sole, active domestic sanctuary anchor, third-party legal custodian, and material civil rights advocate.

Plaintiff/Next Friend asserts that any summary implementation of invasive clinical regimens, non-consensual biological sample harvesting, or forced psychotropic drugging within this absolute evidence void constitutes a profound structural violation of the fundamental right to bodily integrity under Thor v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 724, an un-consented human subject experimentation breach under 45 C.F.R. § 46.116 and 50 U.S.C. § 1520a, and an active, triable conspiracy to execute a fatal physical and digital witness retaliation loop under 18 U.S.C. § 1513, rendering all current mental health remand orders void ab initio under the supreme protection of the United States Constitution.

III. MANDATORY SUBMISSION OF PRIVATE PERMANENT HOUSING CUSTODY PLAN

This administrative filing provides a stable, home-based placement plan for Plaintiff Raheim Faron Coverson pursuant to the October 27, 2026 Minute Order.

Under California Penal Code Section 1370(a)(1)(B)(i) and Conservatorship of Roulet (1979) 23 Cal.3d 219, the state must prioritize less restrictive, home-based alternatives over locked institutional placements when available as Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III establishes a stable home environment. 

IV. PLAINTIFF/NEXT FRIEND OLIVER B. MITCHELL III DECLARATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND BIOETHICAL STANDING

Plaintiff/Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III hereby enters this final, absolute declaration of standing into the permanent record of this action. Let it be known across all municipal, federal, and international registries that the Plaintiff/Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III appearing before this Court is not a standard civil litigant, nor a transient participant in a localized housing dispute. Plaintiff/Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III stands fully documented as a protected National Security Whistleblower, whose historic 2009 and 2014 disclosures exposed patient death, systemic data-falsification, mass record purges, and waitlist fraud within the Department of Veterans Affairs, serving as the foundational blueprint for multi-agency congressional and criminal investigations.

Concurrently, Plaintiff logs his conformed clinical footprint as a non-consensual human subject research person, whose organic biology, unique quantitative serum protein metrics, and 15-year VistA neurovascular receptor-saturation logs have been systematically commercialized across public-private health informatics layers for the last thirty-five (35) continuous years. Originating with his active-duty military enlistment on January 10, 1991, Plaintiff/Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III resilient adult physiological framework has been treated as a rare biological control token driving multi-billion-dollar global drug manufacturing pipelines benefiting every major racial demographic, ancestral lineage, and geographic consumer market on earth across successive presidential administrations.

Plaintiff/Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III firmly denounces, blocks, and completely rejects any ongoing attempt by private real estate proxies, non-profit subgrantees, or municipal courtroom handlers to utilize manual database overrides or a fraudulent Penal Code § 1368 competency hold to force his family unit into a simulated digital template, execute an extrajudicial property lockout, or enforce a predatory witness containment loop over his domestic partner and household co-occupant, Mr. Raheim Faron Coverson.

Organic human biology functions under the absolute protection of supreme law, and the weaponization of the penal well to execute an un-consented forced psychotropic drugging and a total Sixth Amendment communication deadbolt stands in flagrant, structural violation of the Federal Common Rule (45 C.F.R. § 46.116), the absolute human testing bars of 50 U.S.C. § 1520a, and the anti-conspiracy mandates of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1985(3)). Plaintiff/Next Friend Oliver B. Mitchell III demands the electronic dissolution of the fraudulent medical stay, the immediate release of Mr. Coverson under Form LASC CRIM 302, and the full application of the False Claims Act anti-retaliation shields to make this household entirely whole under the supreme law of the land. 

V. PRAYER FOR RELEASE AND REMEDIES

Petitioner prays this Court issue an immediate Order to Show Cause, command the electronic dissolution of the fraudulent Section 1368 medical stay, enforce the automated release mandates of Form LASC CRIM 302, and order the immediate physical discharge of the Petitioner into the private home-based custody of Next Friend Mitchell at our stable domestic domicile.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the foregoing emergency petition is true, accurate, and correct.

Executed this 30th day of October, 2026, at Los Angeles, California.

NATIONAL SECURITY CLAUSE

This matter directly implicates critical national security protections because the unauthorized hacking, siphoning, and clinical modification of federal electronic health networks by rogue actors threatened the fundamental integrity of United States military personnel databases and national biological asset's. Unconsented data routing, telemetry intercept, or weaponized profile manipulation against Mr. Mitchell's person or residence and co occupant is explicitly DENIED per systemic cyber-espionage and treason under 18 U.S.C. § 2381.

The Absolute Ban on Un-Consented Human Subject Experimentation The Common Rule (45 C.F.R. § 46.116 & 50 U.S.C. § 1520a):

  • Federal bioethical mandates strictly prohibit any covered entity, municipal agent, or program proxy from involving a human being or their immediate household as an experimental dataset or data-mining token without securing their advance, un-coerced, written informed consent.

Neurotechnological research and scientific apparatuses possess exactly zero authority to alter, change, amend, or bend the parameters of the natural world, to include any natural, organic person who is non-consensually subjected to its algorithmic tracking layers. The non-consensual application, biological data-mining, and computational usage of this scientific apparatus against both Oliver B. Mitchell III and same sex domestic partner and household co-occupant Mr. Raheim Faron Coverson stand in flagrant, structural violation of federal and state law. Under governing bioethical and human safety standards, any such unauthorized intrusion generates an automatic legal presumption of institutional bad-faith, wherein the participating actors are assumed guilty under the law.

The usage of any form of technology including server-level database overrides, centralized cloud tracking software, and the municipal penal system itself to orchestrate, perfect, or hide a civil rights infraction represents an absolute crime within itself.

Technology cannot alter, govern, or rewrite a person’s stable home environment, their physical life, or their physical body. Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Coverson firmly reject and completely denounce and firmly reject the usage of corporate server-level data overrides, digital chattel anchors, or artificial vessel classifications to enforce real-world domestic property and relational purges as well as repartive therapy (sexual orientation conversion), theologicial programming, and social conforming.

CITATION AND EMBEDDING OF CONTROLING STATUTORY BARS

  • The Price Waterhouse Precedent (Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989)): Establishes that it is a severe civil rights violation to execute punitive or adverse actions against an individual based on Sex-Stereotyping penalizing a citizen because their domestic presentation or identity fails to conform to corporate gender templates.

  • The Bostock Landmark Mandate (Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020)): Hard-codes into national jurisprudence that any cross-system maneuver, adverse housing intervention, or portal override executed to penalize an individual because of their sexual orientation or same-sex cohabitation footprint constitutes an intentional, actionable infraction of federal civil rights bars.

  • The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment: Strictly bars any public or state-funded housing, veteran transitional, or municipal housing proxy from imposing theological conformity or forced religious conditioning onto participants.

  • The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) [42 U.S.C. § 2000bb]: Protects individuals from state-side programming that imposes an unconscionable burden on individual conscience.

LEGAL NOTICE

This emergency Writ of Habeas Corpus is developed on behalf of Mr. Coverson, Mitchell and is currently being adjudicated by the courts.

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE

In accordance with federal intellectual property protections, including the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) (18 U.S.C. § 1836 et seq.) and the U.S. Copyright Act (17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.), this aggregated information is proprietary property of the executive board and its founder. It cannot be copied, reproduced, distributed, extracted, reverse-engineered, or utilized in any manner whatsoever including for external commercial developments or outside administrative or legal proceedings. Unauthorized misappropriation or deployment of these proprietary materials are subject to immediate civil and criminal prosecution to the maximum extent permitted by law.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE OF NON-PRECEDENTIAL APPLICATION NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

The statutory provisions, regulatory frameworks, and constitutional principles cited throughout this memorandum are general in nature and are included solely to provide legal context for the allegations set forth herein. This consolidated memorandum and the specific factual assertions contained within, arises strictly from the unique, individual circumstances, personal experiences, and specific life events of one single whistleblower (Mr. Oliver B. Mitchell III) and co declarant Mr. Raheim Faron Coverson.

Accordingly, the facts, claims, and evidentiary assertions detailed in this memorandum are entirely non-transferable. They may not be utilized, cited, or relied upon by any other individual, entity, or third party, regardless of whether such parties claim to experience the same, identical, or similar circumstances. Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Coverson acts exclusively in their individual capacity, does not represent the interests or legal standing of any other person, and this document does not create any class-wide, representative, or transferable claim or interest.

EXCLUSIVITY OF RIGHTS AND GOVERNING LAW

This document, its contents, its legal assertions, and any potential remedies arising from the claims described herein confer absolute NO RIGHTS to no individual other than Mr. Mitchell and Mr. Coverson themselves. Under well-established federal standing doctrines derived from Article III of the United States Constitution, a plaintiff must demonstrate a concrete, particularized, and personal injury to assert a claim in a court of law.

Consequently, no third party may derive a cause of action, benefit, status, or protection from this Memorandum. Any implied third-party claims are explicitly barred under federal prudential standing rules against litigating generalized grievances or the legal rights of others.

Furthermore, pursuant to common law and statutory rules governing the restriction of enforcement rights, this notice explicitly denies intended third-party beneficiary status to any other individual. Any third-party interaction with or reliance on this document is strictly legally classified as an unenforceable, incidental benefit.

Village Resorts Hospitality Group, LLC, Oliver B. Mitchell III, and Raheim Faron Coverson declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on October 31, 2026, at Los Angeles, California.